Monday, April 27, 2009

What is the real pay-off from implementing Business Intelligence in a SME?

First, notice that I didn't say "Business Intelligence Solution." Too many companies (us included, sometimes) talk about providing solutions to their clients, as if to say, "Here, Mr. Smith. Take this - it's the solution to all your problems." The reality is that BI is a business approach; it's a mentality that says, there is value in all of that data I collect to help me pay taxes, and I'm going to start using it. To talk about a BI solution as if it is a comprehensive way of resolving all business issues is foolhardy.

So back to the original question - what's the value of implementing BI?

In my experience working with small and mid-sized businesses, I have become convinced that the real value of Business Intelligence lies not in the possibility of implementing a 'closed loop' automated decision making process; it is not (at least not always) in delivering personalized dashboards to all employees across the organization. The most significant benefit, whether we're dealing with operation reports, Balanced Scorecards, or something in between, lies in the fundamental ability to access information faster and easier, to support decision-making by people.

What does this mean? Well to me, it means that before going down the path of implementing any particular Business Intelligence technology, it is critical to have a sound grasp of what information is not readily available, and how that is impacting your business.

Let's look at an example - A salesperson is reviewing their client list, to determine how to focus efforts. Should the focus be on the clients that are high volume, profitable customers? Well, you should certainly make efforts to keep those clients happy, yes, but probably not too much action is required. How about the clients who purchase the occasional product, and cause no problems but also generate little profit. Probably not a candidate for much attention. But how about the client who purchases a modest amount of low margin product, and always seems to have delivery or other problems - how about them? That's definitely somewhere for the saleperson to focus. Why? Because we should be working on either a) Helping our customer understand the value and benefit of the other products; b) finding out the root cause of, and resolving, the delivery/service issues to make the client happy, or c) 'firing' the client, to focus efforts on better business relationships.

So here's the next question - could a software product automate the process of closing customer accounts? Well, yes, it is possible. But would you want it to? I can tell you that if I was ever on the end of an automated email saying my account was being closed, I might be a tad upset!!!

The software should help identify the accounts falling within a set of pre-defined conditions, to draw them to the attention of the salesperson. The salesperson then should have all of the appropriate information to connect with the customer, to see if the business relationship can be made more successful FOR BOTH PARTIES. Maybe the customer's concerns are valid, and this is an opportunity to improve service that helps all customers. Maybe the customer never realized the value offered by other products or services, and the salesperson can educate them. And maybe, sometimes, closing the account is just the right thing to do.

The point I'm trying to make here is that the Business Intelligence tool should provide purely objective information (sales, margin, errors, complaints) in a way that it can then be effectively used by the salesperson to make a subjective decision. Decision-making does not happen in a vacuum, and much to the chagrin of some of my peers, we need to recognize the intangible value of a human perspective. Putting blind faith into ANY technology systems without appropriate human monitoring is a recipe for disaster.

This from a guy who believes in the value of Business Intelligence for all businesses!!! :)

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Questions, questions and more questions

Sometimes I think that writing this blog is just an opportunity for me to ask questions. But then again, if you don't ask questions, you don't get answers!

I've recently been pondering the potential of introducing an Open Source Business Intelligence offering into the solutions we provide to clients. Obviously there are pros and cons. It would definitely be a cheaper option for initial software outlay (at least I think so). But would it really be a good option?

As a partner with a large BI vendor, I'd say we get to see the cream of the crop when dealing with fantastically capable tools, with extremely rich functionality and visual appeal. We also have an opportunity to leverage brand recognition of our vendor when it comes to marketing and sales (though sometimes this can also be a hinderance).

So what to do? Introduce the low-cost albeit lower functioning Open Source alternative, or focus on the higher pricetag but very compelling offering from the big vendor? Well for the time being, I think we'll stick with the one vendor option. Though the cost up front is higher, in most cases clients like dealing with a name they at least recognize. I expect that will change as time goes by and companies become more comfortable with the concept of BI in their businesses. But for now, we'll continue to be a single-source provider. For now...

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

What this is about...

A lot of large software vendors are promoting themselves as providing Business Intelligence solutions appropriate for SMBs, but here's my issue - while the solutions are generally functionally and financially appropriate for the upper end of this market space, the reality is that they are not generally an affordable option at the lower end.

For clarification, I better share my definition of the market we're talking about.

Generally (and obviously with exceptions), when I think of mid-sized businesses, I'm thinking of those from about $25 million per annum revenue, and going up to about $350M in annual revenue. I realize that annual revenue is a fairly arbitrary defining characteristic, however people like having boundaries, so there you have it. Under $25 million, generally there is not the scope of business operations to warrant much in the way of sophisticated BI, and over $350M, realistically we're no longer dealing with a mid-sized business.



As the president of a consulting firm implementing BI solutions in the mid-market, I'm hoping I can use my experience to give some insight into viable BI for smaller businesses, and how to get value from appropriate solutions.



And yes, I'll also share my opinion about industry trends and changes for those who care to read them :)



Stay tuned!